Wednesday, October 18, 2006

What's What in Islam - a Guide

Keep this for future reference. Send it on to your congressmen, so they'll
know what everyone's talking about. Inspired by Little Green
Footballs' "Clueless in Washington" post





































Sunni
Shi`ia


Al Qaeda, Taliban Iran
Arab Persian
Libya Hezbullah, Lebanon (Iranian funded)
Iraq, Tikrit (Ba`ath) Iraq (anti-Sadam)
Sudan (Darfur, Black Hawk Down)
Bosnia/Kosovo (Iranian funded)
9/11 Threat of nuclear holocaust
Attempted takeover of the Kaaba in Mecca on Islamic New Year (1980)
Kurds - Majority (mostly of the Shafi school, others of the Hanafi school)
Kurds -Minority ("Al-Fayliah" Kurds)
Caliphate (leadership is by merit)
Sultanate (leadership is hereditary)
Immams - anyone whose faith is strong enough can be Immam
Only descendants of Mohammed can speak "for the faith")
Pashtun (Tribal group living in Eastern Afghanistan & Pakistan) primary ethnic group of the Taliban
Hazara (Iranian speaking ethnic group of Mongolian origin who reside mainly in the central Afghanistan mountain region
Founded by Abu Bakr, father of Muhammad's wife Aisha; first of the "Four Caliphs"
Founded by Muhammad's cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib husband of Muhammed's daughter Fatima Zahra
Ali ibn Abi Talib is 4th Caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib is first Immam
Generally feel superior to other Muslims which can be seen in the Wahabbi (Salafi) perspective that they are holier than other Islamic believers.
Messianic believers who feel that their founder was wrongly displaced and will be redeemed mystically on"judgment day"




The four schools (madhabi) of Sunni Islamic jurisprudance:

All schools base their legal opinions on the traditional four sources,
the Usul al-fiqh:


  • Qur'an - the primary source
  • The sunnah of the prophet Muhammad transmitted as hadith (sayings)
  • Ijma (consensus of the People)
  • Qiyas (analogy)


There is little or no animosity between the four schools of religious
law within Sunni Islam. Instead there is a cross-pollination of
ideas and debate that serves to refine each school's understanding
of Islam. It is not uncommon, or disallowed, for an individual to
follow one school but take the point of view of another school for
a certain issue.

The schools:

Hanafi - largest of the four schools (~45% of Muslims world-wide); most
open to modern ideas, but have strict interpretation of Muslim law.
The Constitution of Afghanistan allows Afghan judges to use Hanafi
jurisprudence in situations where the Constitution lacks provisions.

Maliki - 25% of Muslims, mostly in North Africa and West Africas. Adds
the practice of the people of Medina (amal ahl al-medina) as a
source for jurisprudance in addition to the Usul al-fiqh

Shafi'i - 15% of Muslims - refers to the opinions of the Prophet's
companions in addition to the Usul al-fiqh. Places emphasis on
proper derivation of law, through systematic reasoning without
relying on personal deduction. The official madhab of Brunei
Darussalam and Malaysia.

Hanbali - most conservative, "Textualists" - do not add any other
sources; - 5% of Muslims. Saudi Arabia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Salafi - (Arabic: "predecessors" or "early generations"), adherents of a
contemporary movement in Sunni Islam ascribing understanding and
practice of Islam to the 'Salaf', the first three generations after
Muhammed. Salafism is derogatorily named by outsiders as Wahhabism.
Salafis insist that their beliefs are simply pure Islam and not a
sect. Ultra-conservative in practice, many see violent Jihad as the
only valid path. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Osama bin-Laden,
and the leadership of Saudi Arabia are well-known Salafis.

Sufi - a mystic tradition of Islam encompassing a diverse range of
beliefs and practices dedicated to the love and service of one's
fellow men and Allah/God. Sort of Zen Islam. Believe that love
is a projection of the essence of God to the universe. Practices
include meditation, music, dance. Tariqas (Sufi orders) may be
associated with Shi'a Islam, Sunni Islam, other currents of Islam,
or a combination of multiple traditions.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

The French on their Knees with Olmert-the-Sheep


* Hizbullah fires rockets at the retreating Israeli paratroopers, missed, but Israel did not respond.



* UNIFIL chief says he can only "beg" sides not to shoot.


UNIFIL's helplessness was confirmed by its chief, Maj.-Gen. Alain Pellegrini of France, speaking on BBC last night. Asked what action UNIFIL takes if it sees a ceasefire violation, Pellegrini said, "I try first to make them stop - I call both parties... and I explain to them the situation and I beg them to cease their fire; I am not strong enough to enforce any cessation of confrontation in the field."


Is this world-class pathetic, or is this some Kafka-esque nightmare? Who will change Pellegrini's diapers? What if he loses his security blanket? Will he beg on his knees, like a proper supplicant?


* Beirut: because of Hizbullah leader Nasrallah's refusal to disarm - in violation if the ceasefire agreement - the Lebanese Army may not be able to deploy in the south.

* The return of captives Gilad Shalit (kidnapped by Hamas operatives in Gaza) and Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser (kidnapped by Hizbullah terrorists on the northern border with Lebanon) is not mandated in the text of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, the ceasefire agreement between Hizbullah and Israel.



-=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=-



If it weren't that the French/UN pack of clowns was endangering the lives of both Israeli and Lebanese civilians, this stance of utter moral turpetude would be funny. It is sick, sickening, and leaves me in utter shock how anyone -- from George Bush to Olmert/Perez -- could hope that the UN "farces" will have any mollifying effect on the Hizbullah.

I for one am glad the Lebanese citizens have a moment to breathe. They had a lovely country, and between them and us (in theory), we could have brought up the entire Middle East.

But I am forced to recall Brigitte Gabriel (American of Lebanese Maronite descent) as she thanked Israel for their sacrifice (Op-Ed article here, Arutz-7 interview here, CNN Interview here, responses from enthusiastic ex-pat Lebanese here) -- and how Olmert-sheep has slapped her in the face.

The Hizbullah is already violating the "Cease Fire" by not disarming. The IDF, for all of the gain of a useless high moral position, is incredibly not returning fire.

This was not why Israel went into Lebanon a month ago. This was not why Israel sacrificed 154 murdered, 115 of its finest youth, and 39 civilians that perished under Hezollah rocket attack? This was not what the sheep of a Prime Minister promised. Recall his glowing words in his bleat -- no, address to the Iraeli Knesset on 17 July 2006?


It is a regional - as well as global - interest to take control and terminate their [Hizbullah's] activity.

We intend to do this. We will continue to operate in full force until we achieve this. On the Palestinian front, we will conduct a tireless battle until terror ceases, Gilad Shalit is returned home safely and the shooting of Qassam missiles stops.

And in Lebanon, we will insist on compliance with the terms stipulated long ago by the international community, as unequivocally expressed only yesterday in the resolution of the 8 leading countries of the world:

- The return of the hostages, Ehud (Udi) Goldwasser and Eldad Regev;

- A complete cease fire;

- Deployment of the Lebanese army in all of Southern Lebanon;

- Expulsion of Hizbullah from the area, and fulfillment of United Nations Resolution 1559.

We will not suspend our actions.


This isn't mere glad-handling by a politician. These are bald-faced lies. Olmert-the-sheep never intended to do "this." We ceased operations long before we achieved "this." The Cease Fire is even worse than resolution 1559, for Olmert-sheep has ceded territory (Shaaba farm). No hostage has been returned; no provision has been made for providing that they will be. There is a HLAF cease-fire -- Israel ceased, they're firing. The Lebanese army cannot deploy, so long as Hizbullah does not disarm.

And, rather than having expelled Hizbullah, they are moving back into southern Lebanon in even greater strength and concentration.


-=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=- -=#=-

Original Artutz-7 Article here

IDF BEGINS WITHDRAWAL FROM LEBANON; HIZBULLAH REFUSES TO DISARM
By Hillel Fendel

Paratrooper brigade reservists began returning to Israel this morning. Hizbullah fired rockets at them, but missed; Israel did not respond. UNIFIL chief says he can only "beg" sides not to shoot.

The trek home along dusty roads and brush in southern Lebanon began a short while after midnight. Around the same time, other Israeli forces began reducing their presence and taking up positions overlooking villages used by Hizbullah.

One unit brought with it, on a stretcher, the body of the only female IDF casualty in Lebanon - 26-year-old Keren Tendler of Rehovot, a flight mechanic who was one of five soldiers killed when Hizbullah downed an Israel Air Force helicopter on Saturday night. Her body was recovered only late last night, in an emotional mission, because of heavy fire rained on the area by Hizbullah.

The Lebanese Army says it will begin deploying its forces in the south of the country in the coming days. Israel fears, however - and this is confirmed by Lebanese officials' statements - that Hizbullah terrorists will try to both return to the villages as early as today, and to integrate into the Lebanese Army. It has been said in Beirut that because of Hizbullah leader Nasrallah's refusal to disarm - in violation of the ceasefire agreement - the Lebanese Army may not be able to deploy in the south. The two Hizbullah ministers in the Lebanese Government also said that the terrorist organization would not disarm.

The London-based Al Hayat newspaper reports that a "compromise" agreement being worked on in Lebanon would allow the terrorists to keep weapons - but only in a concealed manner.

Given Hizbullah's refusal to abide by the disarming clause, as well as "the previous poor performance of UNIFIL, it is difficult to envisage a situation in which international peacekeepers would act vigorously to force the disarmament of Hizbullah south of the Litani." This understatement sum-up was penned by commentator Dominic Moran for the Zurich-based ISN (International Relations and Security Network) Security Watch.


UNIFIL Can Only Beg

UNIFIL's helplessness was confirmed by its chief, Maj.-Gen. Alain Pellegrini of France, speaking on BBC last night. Asked what action UNIFIL takes if it sees a ceasefire violation, Pellegrini said, "I try first to make them stop - I call both parties... and I explain to them the situation and I beg them to cease their fire; I am not strong enough to enforce any cessation of confrontation in the field."

Pellegrini, a former French military attache in Beirut who headed the Middle East Division of French military intelligence, said it is "urgent" that the international forces come to support the Lebanese army and reinforce UNIFIL.

As of Tuesday, 118 Israeli soldiers and civilians remained in northern hospitals with wartime wounds. Of them 32 are in serious condition. In Rambam Hospital in Haifa alone, 26 are in serious condition. The hospital absorbed nearly 800 patients throughout the month of fighting.

IDF Northern District Commander Brig.-Gen. Alon Friedman estimates that the reserve soldiers who were called up at the beginning of the warfare will be released in the coming days.

Thousands of northern residents are beginning to stream home. They will be treated to free flights and bus rides home from today until Friday, at government expense. In addition, the Israel Construction Center is offering free expert advise in construction and finance to all those whose homes were damaged by Katyusha rockets.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

CV of Hassan Nasrallah

A very chilling CV of Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary-General of the Hezbollah.

Some highlights:


  • "If they (Jews) all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide. (Daily Star, Oct. 23, 2002)


  • [Hezbollah] was largely credited with driving Israel out of Lebanon in 2000, an event regarded as Israel’s only defeat by an Arab group. Nasrallah’s Lebanon success ... heightened the respect for the Hezbollah leader in the region.


  • This despite the fact that Israel believed at the time that it was pulling out, not as a defeated army, but in an effort to demonstrate cooperation with the international community and as an effort to making "peace". We learn from this that any "peace" settlement will be used as further impetus for future world-wide Hezbollah terror, murder and rockets on the basis that violence, apparently, works.

  • "Our nation's willingness to sacrifice their blood, souls, children, fathers, and families" is an advantage over the Jews who guard their lives."


  • It is no illusion that the Hezbollah have no regard for human life, Arab or Jewish, Muslim or Christian. All are either potential martyrs, or potential press-fodder, or Jews.

  • [Israel] is an illegal state; it is a cancerous entity and the root of all the crises and wars and cannot be a factor in bringing about a true and just peace in this region. Therefore, we cannot acknowledge the existence of a state called Israel, not even far in the future, as some people have tried to suggest. Time does not cancel the legitimacy of the Palestinian claim."


  • Is this someone, are these people who can be convinced to change their minds? To accept a "realpolitik" of a two-State solution, a three-state solution, a 6% solution?

  • "Martyrdom operations - suicide bombings - should be exported outside Palestine. I encourage Palestinians to take suicide bombings worldwide. Don't be shy about it."


  • Worldwide. That means Brazil. Egypt. Bali. Chicago and New York and Aspen. Sydney. Chattenooga. Birmingham, both in the UK and Alabama.


Deal with it: *you* are a target as much as I am for these maniacs.




Hassan Nasrallah: In His Own Words


By Deborah Passner
CAMERA
August 7, 2006


Link to Original article


Since February 1992, Hassan Nasrallah has headed Lebanon’s Hezbollah (or "Party of God") as Secretary-General of the Iranian-backed terrorist group, reportedly receiving $100-200 million of funding from Iran and other supporters in the Arab
world.

Nasrallah is virulently opposed to recognizing the legitimacy of Israel, terming the country a "cancerous entity" of "ultimate evil" whose "annihilation ... is a definite matter." As leader of Hezbollah, he has used its resources to foment violence in the region by inciting, supporting, and funding terrorist attacks on Israel, both by Hezbollah and Hamas.


Nasrallah’s Background

In a recent interview with the Washington Post, Nasrallah revealed his early ambition:


"Ever since I was 9 years old, I had plans for the day when I would start doing this this .... When I was 10 or 11 [I would say] that I'm a cleric, you need to pray behind me.
(July 16, 2006)


Religion seems to have shaped the 46 year old Shiite cleric’s life. Nasrallah, who claims to be a descendant of the Muslim prophet Mohammed and whose name means "victory of God," was born in 1960 in Beirut to parents of modest means.

The eldest of nine children, Nasrallah was fascinated by the Koran from an early age. When civil war broke out in Beirut in 1975, the 15-year-old and his family were forced to move to south to Bassouriyeh, Lebanon. There he met the the religious leader Moussa Al Sadr and joined his Amal movement, a Shiite militia in south Lebanon.

At sixteen, Nasrallah traveled to Najaf, Iraq to continue his study of Islam. He became the protégé of Sheikh Abbas Musawi, a fellow Lebanese who would eventually become the leader of Hezbollah. In 1978, along with hundreds of other radical Lebanese clerics, Nasrallah was expelled from Iraq. He returned to Lebanon to study and teach at a school established by Musawi, and became deeply involved with Amal.

In 1982, when Israel invaded Lebanon, Iran sent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to train Lebanese groups to attack Israel and to eventually create an Islamic state in Lebanon. Musawi and Nasrallah left Amal to form a new group which would become Hezbollah. Nasrallah maintained close ties with Iran and moved there in 1987 to continue his Islamic studies. After returning two years later, when hostilities intensified between rival factions in Lebanon, Nasrallah quickly rose through the ranks of Hezbollah, becoming leader of the organization after Israel assassinated Musawi in February 1992.


Nasrallah and Jews

Within a month of Nasrallah’s taking over as leader, Hezbollah (with the help of Iranian intelligence) bombed the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires, killing 29 and injuring over 200. The next attack perpetrated by Hezbollah—again with Iranian help—was the bombing of the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, killing 86 and injuring over 200. The widening arena of Hezbollah’s attacks stemmed from Nasrallah’s perception that Jews anywhere are legitimate targets. In fact, Nasarallah has said:


"If they (Jews) all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.
(Daily Star, Oct. 23, 2002)


Shiite scholar Amal Saad-Ghorayeb analyzed the anti-Jewish roots of Hezbollah ideology in her book Hezbollah: Politics & Religion. In it, she quotes Hassan Nasrallah describing his antipathy toward Jews:


"If we searched the entire world for a person more cowardly, despicable, weak and feeble in psyche, mind, ideology and religion, we would not find anyone like the Jew. Notice, I do not say the Israeli."
(New Yorker, Oct. 14, 2002)



Nasrallah also incorporates anti-Semitic rhetoric in speeches. For example, he has characterized Jews as the "grandsons of apes and pigs" and "Allah’s most cowardly and greedy creatures."
(MEMRI: Al- Manar, Feb. 3, 2006) Despite his anti-Semitic invective, there are few references to this in the mainstream media.



Nasrallah and Israel

Hezbollah’s attacks against Israel have escalated under Nasrallah’s leadership. In 1993, a year after he became the leader of Hezbollah, 26 Israeli soldiers were killed (twice as many as the year before). The group fired almost 150 Katyushas in
1993, and more than doubled that number in 1996 when it sent nearly 500 rockets into Israel. As a result, Israeli casualties from Hezbollah attacks continued to mount. In 1997, nearly forty Israeli soldiers were killed battling Hezbollah. Suicide bombings and other terrorist attacks by the group took a toll on Israelis, and the group was largely credited with driving Israel out of Lebanon in 2000, an event regarded as Israel’s only defeat by an Arab group. Nasrallah’s Lebanon success and the fact that his eldest son, Hadi, fought and died while confronting Israel in 1997 heightened the respect for the Hezbollah leader in the region.


In an oft-quoted speech just after Israel pulled out of southern Lebanon in May 2000, Hassan Nasrallah vividly described his view of the Jewish state as fragile and easily destroyed despite outward appearances of strength:


"O people, our beloved and our dear brothers in Palestine, I want to tell you that this Israel, which possesses nuclear weapons and the most powerful air force in the region, by God, it is weaker than a spider web ...."
(May 26, 2000)


Just a few days later, Nasrallah elaborated on Hezbollah’s goals:


"One of the central reasons for creating Hizbullah was to challenge the Zionist program in the region. Hizbullah still preserves this principle, and when an Egyptian
journalist visited me after the liberation and asked me if the destruction of Israel and the liberation of Palestine and Jerusalem were Hizbullah's goal, I replied:



'That is the principal objective of Hizbullah, and it is no less sacred than our ultimate] goal. The generation that lived through the creation of this entity is till alive. This generation watches documentaries and reads documents that show that the land conquered was called Palestine, not Israel.'


"We face an entity that conquered the land of another people, drove them out of their land, and committed horrendous massacres. As we see, this is an illegal state; it is a cancerous entity and the root of all the crises and wars and cannot be a factor in bringing about a true and just peace in this region. Therefore, we cannot
acknowledge the existence of a state called Israel, not even far in the future, as some people have tried to suggest. Time does not cancel the legitimacy of the Palestinian claim."
(Hasan Nasrallah, interview, Egyptian television, June 2, 2000).



Hezbollah’s tactics became a model for other terrorist groups confronting a strong enemy. Nasrallah explained to a Washington Post reporter that:


"The Israeli Air Force could destroy the Lebanese army within hours ... but cannot do this with us ... we exercise guerilla warfare"
(July 16, 2006).



Nasrallah sought to inspire the Palestinians with Hezbollah’s success against the Israelis. "Palestinians," he said, need to "struggle for their freedom ... and Lebanon is a good example." He said: "We have liberated Lebanon, next we’ll liberate
Jerusalem." He urged Arabs to "put a knife in your shirt, then get close to an Israeli occupier and stab him." (Nightline, Oct. 19, 2000) Perhaps, not surprisingly, the Palestinians launched their deadliest assault against Israel in September 2000 only a few months after Israeli forces left Lebanon.


Nasrallah, Incitement, and Al-Manar TV

Incitement was always part and parcel of Hezbollah’s strategy. In an interview with Al-Safir, Nasrallah described his priorities and methods in the first months of Hezbollah’s formation:


"The main effort at the time went into mustering and attracting young men and setting up military camps ....

"The second effort was spreading the word among the people, first, in a bid to raise their morale, and second to instil in them a sense of animosity towards the enemy, coupled with a spirit of resistence...this required us to use the language of indoctrination rather than realpolitik.

"People then were not in need of political analysis, they were in need of being incited and goaded."
(Hala Jaber, Hezbollah Born With a Vengeance, Columbia University Press, 1997, pp. 49-50)


Nasrallah purveys his message via Hezbollah’s own television network, Al-Manar, a primary engine of incitement to violence against Jews, Israelis and Americans. Al Manar’s stated mission is to "wage psychological warfare against the Zionist enemy."
This is often done by glorifying attacks, particularly suicide missions against Israel. Last year, Nasrallah appeared on Al-Manar encouraging "martyrdom" among children, saying:


"How can death become joyous? How can death become happiness? When Al-Hussein asked his nephew Al-Qassem, when he had not yet reached puberty: 'How do you like the taste of death, son?' He answered that it was sweeter than honey.

How can the foul taste of death become sweeter than honey? Only through conviction, ideology, and faith, through belief, and devotion.

We do not want to...leave our homeland to Israel... Therefore, we are not interested in our own personal security. On the contrary, each of us lives his days and nights hoping more than anything to be killed for the sake of Allah."
(MEMRI: Al-Manar TV, Feb. 18-19, 2005)



In May [2006], Nasrallah appeared on Al-Manar TV to explain that "our nation's willingness to sacrifice their blood, souls, children, fathers, and families" is an advantage over the Jews "who guard their lives." (MEMRI: Al-Manar TV on May 23, 2006.)


Nasrallah and the Palestinian-Israeli dispute

Nasrallah has inflamed tensions between Israel and the Palestinians by using Hezbollah’s resources to assist Palestinians attack on Israelis. He told AP that Hezbollah supplied Palestinian terrorists with weapons until 2001 when Israel intercepted a boat with supplies bound for the West Bank. Hezbollah, he acknowledged, continued to provide other forms of support for Palestinian terrorists including "financial, political and media support." (AP, April 26, 2006)


Nasrallah has denounced every peace agreement made between Israel and the Palestinians, instead encouraging them to be violently rejected. He believes that "lands can [only] be returned through Holy War, martyrdom, blood, sacrifices and bullets."(Chicago Tribune, Nov. 27, 2000) For example, when the Palestinians were considering modifying their charter by taking out references to Israel’s illegitimacy, the Hezbollah leader responded:


"The Palestinian National Charter will live on as long as there is a knife in a Palestinian woman's hand with which she stabs an Israeli soldier or settler ... as long as there are suicide bombers in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv ... and as long as there is a child who throws a stone in the face of an Israeli soldier."
(AP, Dec. 12, 1998)



Nasrallah and the Palestinians in Lebanon

While Nasrallah urges Palestinians to die fighting for their "rights" and "freedom" against Israel, he rejects giving citizenship rights to Palestinians who live in Lebanon:


"The Lebanese refuse to give the Palestinians residing in Lebanon Lebanese citizenship, and we refuse their resettlement in Lebanon. There is Lebanese consensus on this...we thank God that we all agree on one clear and definite result; namely, that we reject the resettlement of the Palestinians in Lebanon."
(BBC Monitoring: Al-Manar TV, Nov. 5, 2003)



Anti-Americanism

While Israel is the main focus of Hezbollah’s enmity, Nasrallah’s anti-American sentiments are continuously on display. He fuels anti-American attitudes in the Middle East with charges such as his statement that Americans "have outdone Hitler." (AP, Oct. 2, 2001)

During one TV broadcast, Narallah accused the US of many "sponsored plans for extermination, eradication and genocide" against the people in the Middle East. (BBC Monitoring: Al-Manar, Feb. 8, 2002) A 2002 appearance on Al-Manar illustrates his deep hostility toward the United States:


"Let the entire world hear me. Our hostility to the Great Satan [America] is absolute ...


"I conclude my speech with the slogan that will continue to reverberate on all occasions so that nobody will think that we have weakened. Regardless of how the world has changed after 11 September, Death to America will remain our reverberating and powerful slogan: Death to America."
(BBC Monitoring: Al-Manar, Sep. 27, 2002)


Nasrallah boasts about Hezbollah’s designation as a terrorist group by America:


"It is our pride that the Great Satan (U.S.) and the head of despotism, corruption and arrogance in modern times considers us as an enemy that should be listed in the terrorism list...I say to every member of Hezbollah (should) be happy and proud that
your party has been placed on the list of terrorist organizations as the U.S. view it."
(United Press International, Nov. 4, 2001)


At a rally in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley, Nasrallah encouraged worldwide suicide bombing against the West:


"Martyrdom operations - suicide bombings - should be exported outside Palestine. I encourage Palestinians to take suicide bombings worldwide. Don't be shy about it."
(Washington Times, Dec. 6, 2002)



Global Reach

The group is reported to have worldwide influence and reach. According to Magnus Ranstorp, the director of the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland:


"It [Hezbollah] has served as a role model for terror groups around the world ... Al Qaeda learned the value of choreographed violence from Hezbollah ...."


According to both American and Israeli intelligence officials, the group maintains floating "day camps" for terrorist training throughout the Bekaa Valley. ... In some of them, the instructors are supplied by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iran's Ministry of Intelligence. In the past twenty years, terrorists from such
disparate organizations as the Basque separatist group ETA, the Red Brigades, the Kurdistan Workers' Party, and the Irish Republican Army have been trained in these camps" (New Yorker, Oct. 14, 2002)

Nasrallah and his well-funded terrorist organization have promoted violence worldwide and have helped thwart peaceful resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Friday, January 06, 2006

A Tale of Two Stevens

A Pre-Post Mortem

Stephen Green, in his blog VodkaPundit article A Pre-Post Mortem, writes (in part):

Since assuming office in 2001, Sharon has completely remodeled Israel's defensive situation – by putting the Palestinian Authority on the defensive, militarily, politically, and morally.

By forcing Jewish settlers out of Gaza, Sharon angered many of his rightwing allies in the Likud Party. By doing so without a formal treaty with the PA, Sharon completely alienated Israel's leftwing Labor Party. Trapped in the center – much like his division was once trapped behind Egyptian lines – Sharon came up with a creative solution: last November, he founded a new political party, Kadima. The goal was to create a centrist party to formally pursue Sharon's security goals, without being beholden to crazies on the left or the right.



Stupid, Suicidal, and Self-destructive

The Retreat-in-Panic, which is euphemistically referred to as the "disengagement", was a stupid, suicidal, and self-destructive act. Its wonderful results include:

  • El-Kassam missiles are now falling in Ashkelon and Negev settlements, rather than "merely" Sderot;

  • Utter chaos reigns in Gaza city, as armed gangs vie for their piece of turf;

  • Palestinians in Gaza are out of work, the economy in shambles, their Jewish employers thrown out and industries razed with nothing remotely in sight to replace them;

  • The border between Gaza and Egypt, which Egypt was supposed to maintain, is breached, open, and arms and materiel flows freely to terrorists who have frightened off European Union observers*;

  • And six months after the debacle,most of the families who were uprooted from Judenrein Gaza are still homeless, jobless, and without basic services such as health and schooling.


If this is what Kadima claims to its credit, then good riddance.

What is "moral high-ground" about self-destruction? That would be about as immoral as can be, except that it also drags along the destruction of innocents on all sides.

* It boggles the mind what these observers were supposed to do in the first place. Observe the terrorists to death? Strike a blow against terrorism with a magic glare? Who's fooling whom here?


UnDisengagement

On the other hand, Prof. Steven Plaut's Op-Ed The Most Effective Defense Against Rockets presents the case for an UnDisngagement.

In part, Prof. Plaut says...

It should have been obvious that the expulsion would result in massive escalation in violence and in Kassam and mortar fire, which would eventually make an ever-widening circle inside Israel and around Gaza unlivable. Well, we are clearly well on our way to fulfillment of that prediction.

The abandoned Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip are the closest points from which the PLO can fire rockets at Negev towns. The Israeli heavy artillery has been moved up to prevent the PLO and its Hamas affiliates from entering those abandoned settlements in order to set up and fire rockets at the Negev.


Poppa Arik

Many Israelis supported Sharon and his party because they're just tired and are looking for a Strong Daddy to make it all better. Tired of fighting, of incessant reserve army duty. Tired of the threat of terror. Tired of struggling to make the end of the month. Tired of seeing diplomatic failure after failure, as no agreement signed by the Palestinians has ever been honored.

Far from being in retreat, the Paletinians' only reason for not committing more horror lately is because of the internal power struggle raging over the post-Arafat vacuum.


The Emporer's New... Um...

Am I one of those "crazies", who see the damn Wall as a waste of money and false security, who actually believe the Palestinians when they proclaim the Retreat-in-Panic as a victory for them, and who believes that "Fortress Israel" is nothing more than Warsaw Revisited? Who's crazy? A party who is proud of the blows it's struck against the Windmill of no-Negotiations? An emporer who stood buck-naked in the light of fear of the gentile and Arab?

Or the boy who simply asks him why he has no clothes on?

Friday, November 25, 2005

Tale of Two Cities

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times..." So begins Charles Dickens' novel of the French Revolution. In a modern version of Dickens' vision, the worst of the times -- or the Guardian of London in this case -- chooses to proclaim how Israel is "threatening the peace" by daring to claim all of Jerusalem as capital.

Threatening the Peace


Secret British document accuses Israel

FO paper says international laws are being violated and peace jeopardised
Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
Friday November 25, 2005
The Guardian

A confidential [British] Foreign Office document accuses Israel of rushing to annex the Arab area of Jerusalem, using illegal Jewish settlement construction and the vast West Bank barrier, in a move to prevent it becoming a Palestinian capital.

In an unusually frank insight into British assessments of Israeli intentions, the document says that Ariel Sharon's government is jeopardising the prospect of a peace agreement by trying to put the future of Arab East Jerusalem beyond negotiation and risks driving Palestinians living in the city into radical groups.


Why does the claim to an eternally United Jerusalem threaten the peace?

I prefer to ask, why do the Palestinians specifically claim "El Kuds" as their capital, rather than Ramallah or Shchem? Of all places, this is the place that they want?

Why are they so insistant, so intransigent on this point? (Let's not ask the pposite question, are they flexible on any point? Let's not say that every single concession bar none that Israel has "won" from the Arabs has either been abrogated, or never even given a nodding attempt at fulfillment.)


The Prime Directive

The Palestinians, and their Guardian lapdogs, are so insistant for a very simple, but basic reason, and it is this motivator that explains much of the Palestinians' policies:

If it's something important to the Jews, then it's vitally important to conquor and overrun.


This is typical of historic Muslim imperialist techniques: after taking over an infidel's land, the first op consists of razing any place of worship, and then building a mosque over it.

One place this is blatantly obvious is in the building over the Cave of the forefathers, in Hevron.


The Ma'arah

Hevron, the city, has existed for thousands of years. In approximately 1677 BCE, Avraham, the acknowledged forefather of both the Muslims and ourselves, purchased the rights to a cave in the Hevron hills to bury his beloved wife, and our ultimate mother, Sarah. The agreement and deed is recorded publicly, and you need merely to open your bible to Genesis 23 to read it. Purchased. Not "occupied".

We have never relinquished our ownership of the area. In fact, to commemorate and immortalize this, the Jewish king Herod built a large building over the caves, in the form of the Temple in Jerusalem, during the Roman period, about 20 or so BCE.

Following the Crusades, with the ascendancy of Muslim rule over the Land of Israel, the ruling Mamlukes (13th-16th centuries) transformed this building into a mosque, removing much of its original Jewish nature, even though there were Jews living and thriving continuously in Hevron from the Roman period. During the Ottoman period, the Jews were allowed to use a couple of the rooms in this building for synagogues; to this day, you can see scrollwork in Jewish motifs (Stars of David, Menorahs) in the smaller Chamber of Jacob, and in various places in the large, central Chamber of Isaac.


Six holes

But also readily apparent in the large, central Chamber of Jacob, are fairly obvious attempts by the Arabs to remove these signs. In each of the three "chambers" in the building are representations of tombs of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs, buried below in the caves. In the Chamber of Jacob, these block-like mini-buldings have brass grillwork gates, always kept locked. On each of these gates is a 6" circle -- with a crescent moon in the center.

But a closer examination shows two curious things: the moon is of different, less expensive metal; and there are six holes in the surrounding circle, even though the moons are attached by only four. Why six? What symbol was excised from the grillwork, that connected to the outer circle at six points?

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Arabs ask Settlers: Help in Banishing the Leftists

A tidbit from Arutz-7, the banned right-wing Israeli radio station:

Hevron Arabs Ask Jews For Help In Banishing Leftist Activists
By Ezra HaLevi

Arab leaders in Hevron have contacted the city’s Jewish leaders for help in getting rid of self-proclaimed anarchist volunteers who, they complain, are destroying their traditional way of life.

The anarchists, many of whom are members of the International Solidarity Movement, flock to flashpoints throughout Judea and Samaria, ostensibly to help PA Arabs contend with IDF closures and protect them from harassment. In actuality, many of the volunteers seek confrontations with IDF soldiers and local Jewish residents, taking advantage of their Western passports to cause havoc – knowing that, at worst, they will be deported, not jailed.

(Rest of article is here).


This story isn't so untoward. When I was a resident of Kiriat Arba, about 20 years ago, I used to pray at sunrise in the building over the Cave of the Forefathers in Hevron, just a 10 minute walk away. We would see the members of the Waqf, the Muslim Religious leadership, and would nod back and forth as we passed -- tense, but peaceful.

When I left Kiriat Arba to live in Yitzhar -- near Shchem, or Nablus, in the North -- I came over to the head of the Waqf and wished him well. Reacting to where I was going, Ibrahim said to me, "Be careful of those Shchemites *-- they are irreligious, and are dangerous."

One of the keys to understanding Arabs is that they are *NOT* monolithic, but that each group is dangerous in their own way. Part of the background for the chaos that has come to fore now in Gaza -- it was never hidden -- is the extreme hatred between the religious Hamas and Hizbulla on one side, and the irreligious Fatah on the other.

In the Judea/Samaria paradigm, the area about Hevron in the south is almost uniformly religious, blending to religious Christians (that remain) in Bet-Lehem (Bethleham) and Bet Gala towards Jerusalem; north of Jerusalem, you have Ramallah which is mixed and has its own tensions, to Shchem, historically controlled by secular Arabs and the site of the large University and medical school.

Let there be no mistake -- had I turned my back on the Waqf and appeared weak, they would have attacked me. We both understood this, and accepted it as natural and normal for them. The Arab culture is hierarchical to a fault; trying to impose a Western concept like "equality" or "mutual trust" is an anathema to them, and breeds both hatred, and quiet disdain.


* Shchemites - residents of Shchem. I guess if you don't like them, you're an anti-Shchemite?

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Krembos & Ketyushas

Consider this story, recently carried as "Odd news" by Reuters:


Marshmallow treats stopped from leaving Gaza
Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:39 AM ET

The Chief Rabbinate, which ensures anything labeled as kosher complies with the Jewish dietary law, said the boxes of "krembos" were sent back because they had forged kosher seals.

A spokeswoman for the Chief Rabbinate said Israel does not import any of its krembos. The round chocolate shells filled with flavored marshmallow cream on a biscuit are one of the country's most popular winter snack foods.

The Karni crossing from Gaza was reopened last week under a U.S.-brokered deal to ease restrictions on the 1.4 million Palestinians living in the impoverished territory following Israel's withdrawal in September.

Israel inspects all goods leaving Gaza closely, saying it must do so to prevent the smuggling of weapons or suicide bombers by militants waging an uprising.

Palestinian businesses complain that checks cause costly delays and sometimes mean perishable goods are ruined before they can be exported to Israel, the West Bank or beyond.


OK. not the most devastating thing in the universe. But consider the reverse: if an Israeli company shipped snacks containing pig fat to the PA. What would happen? Riots. World condemnation. UN resolutions. Accusations of aparthied, of racist Jews with no respect for innocent Muslims, et cetera, ad nauseum.

Meanwhile, the ketyushas and mortar shells fall on the northern settlements in the most serious and intensive attack on Israel by the Hizbullah in years. Oh, the deafening outcry from the world!


The Oh-so-neutral BBC, again

In brief, on Monday, 21 Nov, the Hizbollah launched a broad offensive in a number of places along Israel's border with Lebanon. Following a rocket and border barrage, terrorists crossed the border intending on kidnap Israeli soldiers. Far beyond a mere military attack, rockets and mortar shells were directed against civilian towns all along the northern border. The BBC, though, seemed to ignore much of this in its continuing atttempt at "neutrality":

HEADLINE: DEADLY CLASH ON LEBANESE BORDER

Israeli troops have killed three Hezbollah fighters during a guerrilla attack near the Lebanese border, which also left several Israelis wounded.

No civilian targets? Mass-terrorism becomes a "clash"? Terrorists are now "fighters", a nice, neutral term?

Please refer to the fine and in-depth analysis on this at Honest Reporting


Denial of Legitimacy

What's the connection? Very simple: when you allow your own legitamacy to be denied, then any attack, whether of fire or of food, becomes legitimate itself.

Non-observant Israelis, by marginalizing Kashrut concerns, give ex-post-facto approval to the foreign press to regard cultural terrorism to become "Odd News".

The issue isn't the krembos or the kashrut -- it's the marginalizing (thus, delegitimizing) of something that, had it been reversed, would have had the world up in arms.


Knee-jerks

Perhaps I'm just used to the press (both Israeli and world) and the State Prosecutor here having knee-jerk reactions over the reverse. People have been jailed for a couple of years or more for leaving a pig's head on the grave of the 1930's Palestinian terrorist Izz el-Deen al-Qassam, the inspiration for Hamas:

Attacks on mosques could lead to an Israeli Arab revolt, the Islamic Movement's northern branch leader, Sheikh Raed Salah, said on Friday during a rally at the Hassan Bek Mosque in southern Tel Aviv, one week after a pig's head was thrown into the mosque. Haaretz (reposted) Friday, Aug. 26, 2005 22:18

Then there's Tatiana Suskind, a Jewish girl living in Hevron, who planned to circulate a drawing of Muhhammed as a pig, and got prison time for that henious crime. Not circulated: planned to circulate.

Had someone had tossed the same head into a synagogue, they'd merely be fined for littering for their stupidity. Or less... as the case of the frat student, who, thinking he was posting his pig's head in front of a vegetarian restaurant, put it at a Kosher one instead. He got a mention in the news, had to apologize, and pay $50 to pick up the garbage.

The State Prosecutor's Office and Shabaq (Israeli secret police) are very straightforward why they're so hard on this: they fear that these actions will endanger the State, in their words.

Take for example, this gem:

JERUSALEM (JTA) (Friday April 2, 1999) -- Two Israeli extremists were convicted Tuesday on charges that included incitement, arson and sedition.

Avigdor Eskin and Damien Pakovitch were found guilty of placing a pig's head on the grave of Islamic leader Izz aDin al-Kassam, torching the Jerusalem offices of the Dor Shalom peace movement, and planning to put a pig's head on the Temple Mount.

The judge wrote in his verdict that if the Temple Mount plot had succeeded, it could have led to war with the Muslim world and perhaps even to the destruction of Israel.

Wow. He must think the State is really fragile, if a mere act of stupidity can bring about its destruction.


Intention

Some see this as a kind of 'intention' thing, too: if the intention of the piggers is to frighten or anger someone, then they see this as a big difference from someone falsely labeling something as kosher.


The real point

The labeling fraud had two purposes:

  • one, to make a quick buck, and

  • two, to step on the stupid Jews


  • A bona-fide kashrut seal does cost money, because the manufacturers have to pay for the time and effort -- and sometimes considerable expenses -- of expert kashrut inspectors, who trace the origin of all chemicals and ingredients that go into a manufactured food product.

    But what is more to the point here is that Arabs who get away with that sort of thing can "count coup". Unfortunately, when they can get away a little thing, often it grows.

    By getting the world press and public opinion used to making nothing of a direct attack against Judaism, they lay the groundwork for trivializing blatant and bloody attacks against unarmed non-combattants.